Reparative Substitution and the ‘Efficacy Objection’: Toward a Modified Satisfaction Theory of Atonement
The doctrine of the atonement is a subject of perpetual curiosity for a number of contemporary theologians. The penal substitution theory of atonement in particular has precipitated a great deal of recent interest, being held up by many (mostly evangelical) Protestants as ‘the’ doctrine of atonement...
| Published in: | Perichoresis |
|---|---|
| Authors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sciendo, De Gruyter
2017
|
| In: |
Perichoresis
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KDD Protestant Church NBK Soteriology NBM Doctrine of Justification |
| Further subjects: | B
Atonement
substitution
sufficiency-efficiency
Anselm
mechanism
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567874061 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180202141722.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/perc-2017-0018 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567874061 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497874067 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497874067 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)perc-2017-0018 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Farris, Joshua R. |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Farris, Joshua R. |a Farris, Joshua Ryan |a Farris, Joshua | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reparative Substitution and the ‘Efficacy Objection’: Toward a Modified Satisfaction Theory of Atonement |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The doctrine of the atonement is a subject of perpetual curiosity for a number of contemporary theologians. The penal substitution theory of atonement in particular has precipitated a great deal of recent interest, being held up by many (mostly evangelical) Protestants as ‘the’ doctrine of atonement. In this essay, we make a defense against the objection to the Anselmian theory of atonement that is often leveled against it by exponents of the Penal Substitution theory, namely, that Christ’s work does not accomplish anything for those whom it appears he undertakes his atoning work, but merely makes provision for salvation. | ||
| 601 | |a Substitution | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Atonement |x substitution |x sufficiency-efficiency |x Anselm |x mechanism | |
| 652 | |a KDD:NBK:NBM | ||
| 700 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)104456850X |0 (DE-627)772190186 |0 (DE-576)397944845 |4 aut |a Hamilton, S. Mark | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Perichoresis |d Warsaw, Poland : Sciendo, De Gruyter, 2003 |g 15(2017), 3, Seite 97-110 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)730279154 |w (DE-600)2691385-9 |w (DE-576)375595902 |x 2284-7308 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:97-110 |
| 856 | |u https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/perc/15/3/article-p97.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/perc-2017-0018 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 15 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 97-110 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2994682044 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567874061 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180912100713 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050047 |a KDD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052384 |a NBM | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||