Quid Pro Quo Satisfaction? An Analysis and Response to Garry Williams on Penal Substitutionary Atonement and Definite Atonement

Advocates of definite atonement have often argued that penal substitutionary atonement entails the doctrine that Christ satisfied for the sins of the elect alone. Recently, Garry Williams published two essays in a book entitled From Heaven He Came and Sought Her defending the thesis that logical con...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Evangelical quarterly
Main Author: Lynch, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: The Evangelical quarterly
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDD Protestant Church
NBK Soteriology
Further subjects:B Reformed Church doctrines
B Atonement
B WILLIAMS, Garry
B limited atonement
B Owen, John
B Reformed Theology
B DABNEY, R. L
B Penal Substitution
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Advocates of definite atonement have often argued that penal substitutionary atonement entails the doctrine that Christ satisfied for the sins of the elect alone. Recently, Garry Williams published two essays in a book entitled From Heaven He Came and Sought Her defending the thesis that logical consistency demands that if one affirms penal substitution, classically understood, then one must affirm definite atonement. This paper responds to Williams's two essays and his main thesis by noting several historical considerations that significantly undermine Williams's exposition of what he deems to be the 'classic' doctrine of penal substitutionary atonement. Further it is shown that the various theological problems proffered by Reformed theologians against Williams's pecuniary version of penal substitution-such as R. L. Dabney's response to John Owen's double-payment argument-are inadequately addressed.
ISSN:2772-5472
Contains:Enthalten in: The Evangelical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/27725472-08901004