The Coherence of Penal Substitution: An Edwardsean Defence
Among recent evaluations of penal substitutionary atonement one significant critique is that given the necessary and sufficient conditions for punishment the doctrine is incoherent. In this essay I defend the coherence of penal substitution by providing an account of Christ’s relationship to humanit...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado: |
2019
|
| En: |
Tyndale bulletin
Año: 2019, Volumen: 70, Número: 1, Páginas: 95-115 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Edwards, Jonathan 1703-1758
/ Doctrina de la creación
/ Castigo de los pecados
/ Expiación
/ Redención
|
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Doctrine
B Atonement B jonathan edwards B Penal Substitution |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | No electrónico
|
| Sumario: | Among recent evaluations of penal substitutionary atonement one significant critique is that given the necessary and sufficient conditions for punishment the doctrine is incoherent. In this essay I defend the coherence of penal substitution by providing an account of Christ’s relationship to humanity such that it is conceptually possible to meet the necessary and sufficient conditions for punishment. In order to do this, I turn to Jonathan Edwards’ understanding of creation and identity. I show that a view called ‘Edwardsean Anti-Criterialism’ provides the metaphysics necessary for a coherent account of penal substitution. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0082-7118 |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Tyndale bulletin
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.53751/001c.27714 |
