La falta de motivación de las decisiones episcopales de revocación de la idoneidad de los profesores de religión y su control jurisdiccional
According to ruling 38/2007 issued by the Constitutional Court on 15 February of that year, the freedom of religious denominations to make decisions concerning the suitability of those entrusted to teach their creed is subject to some control by the courts so as to ensure that religious and moral co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
HeinOnline
2016
|
| In: |
Ius canonicum
Year: 2016, Volume: 56, Issue: 112, Pages: 695-728 |
| Further subjects: | B
Revocación
B Motivación B Idoneidad eclesiástica B Control jurisdiccional |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | According to ruling 38/2007 issued by the Constitutional Court on 15 February of that year, the freedom of religious denominations to make decisions concerning the suitability of those entrusted to teach their creed is subject to some control by the courts so as to ensure that religious and moral concerns and the fundamental rights of the teacher as a working professional are lawful and compatible. In this regard, whether or not the church authority has set out in writing the eligibility criteria regulating teachers is of vital importance. Revocation of such suitability is not a no-fault decision; the church authority is subject to religious and moral criteria and, therefore, the need for grounds of motivation may be inherent to any such determination. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.112.695-728 |