“My Sad Face”: An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of the Dialogue Between Nehemiah, Son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Nehemiah 2,2-8
In this paper, I define and apply M. Halliday’s interpersonal metafunction methodology, a socio-linguistic approach to language known as Systemic Functional Linguistics, to an analysis of the dialogue between Nehemiah, son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Neh 2,2-8. My purpose is to d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2020]
|
| In: |
Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Year: 2020, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 161-186 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Nehemiah Biblical character
/ Ezra, Biblical person
/ Hebrew language
/ Linguistics
/ Sociology
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HD Early Judaism |
| Further subjects: | B
Interpersonal Metafunction
B Bibel, Nehemia, 2,2-8 B Systemic Functional Linguistics B Bible. Nehemia 2,2-8 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In this paper, I define and apply M. Halliday’s interpersonal metafunction methodology, a socio-linguistic approach to language known as Systemic Functional Linguistics, to an analysis of the dialogue between Nehemiah, son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Neh 2,2-8. My purpose is to discover some truths concerning the social dynamics that exist between Nehemiah and Artaxerxes to inevitably uncover who, that being the governing discourse participant, is responsible for and/or holds in his control Judah’s restoration. To accomplish this task, I conduct both a mirco- and macro-level analysis of the designated corpus. In the end, the data reveals that Artaxerxes is the governing discourse participant though Nehemiah dominates the discourse by saying more. However, taking the greater co-text and context of Nehemiah into consideration, specifically Nehemiah’s prayer of chapter 1, there is potentially a third unmentioned discourse participant who could well be the one governing the result of the present dialogue. This unmentioned discourse participant is invariably Yahweh. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1502-7244 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2020.1805203 |