Does the Flesh Possess Hypostatic Idioms, and If So, Why is it Then Not a Separate Hypostasis?: On a Conceptual Problem of Late Patristic Christology
This article focuses on a conceptual problem that arose from the application to Christology of the Cappadocian definition of hypostasis as substance with idioms. It discusses the solutions that were proposed by John of Caesarea, Leontius of Byzantium, John Philoponus, Leontius of Byzantium, Maximus...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2019]
|
In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2019, Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: 193-210 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages NBF Christology |
Further subjects: | B
Maximus the Confessor
B John of Caesarea B hypostatic idioms B Leontius of Byzantium B John Philoponus B John of Damascus B Leontius of Jerusalem |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This article focuses on a conceptual problem that arose from the application to Christology of the Cappadocian definition of hypostasis as substance with idioms. It discusses the solutions that were proposed by John of Caesarea, Leontius of Byzantium, John Philoponus, Leontius of Byzantium, Maximus the Confessor and John of Damascus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00151P13 |