The Miaphysite and Neo-Chalcedonian Approaches to Understanding the Nature of the Individual Entity: Particular Essence vs. En-Hypostasized Essence
In debates over the Christological doctrine proclaimed at the Council of Chalcedon, two different Christological stances took shape that in fact carried not only significant theological consequences, but also profound philosophical ones. In the present paper, I shall reflect upon the philosophical p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sciendo
[2019]
|
| In: |
Review of ecumenical studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 342-362 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology NBF Christology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Enhypostaton
B Miaphysitism B particular nature B Leontius of Byzantium B Neo-Chalcedonism B John Philoponus B particular essence B enhypostasized essence B John Grammarian |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In debates over the Christological doctrine proclaimed at the Council of Chalcedon, two different Christological stances took shape that in fact carried not only significant theological consequences, but also profound philosophical ones. In the present paper, I shall reflect upon the philosophical premises and arguments employed by both the defenders of Chalcedon and their adversaries. As I shall seek to show, both sides differed, among other things, in regard to their understanding of the individual entity as such. The Miaphysite adversaries of the Chalcedonian Horos adopted what was, from a philosophical point of view, a quite traditional elucidation of individual entities in terms of particular essence. On the other hand, the Neo-Chalcedonian defenders of the Horos developed an original interpretation of the individual entity as explicable in terms of its existence. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2359-8107 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Review of ecumenical studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/ress-2019-0026 |