Enhypostaton: Being “in Another” or Being “with Another”?—How Chalcedonian Theologians of the Sixth Century defined the Ontological Status of Christ’s Human Nature
This article focuses on the term enhypostaton. It makes the case that this term was originally coined in order to express three modes of being: “by itself”, “with another” and “in another”. The first and third of these modes could not explain the status of the flesh as a nature, which does not have...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Jahr: 2017, Band: 71, Heft: 4, Seiten: 433-448 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | KAD Kirchengeschichte 500-900; Frühmittelalter NBE Anthropologie NBF Christologie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Christology
Chalcedonian Formula
Enhypostaton
Hypostasis
John of Damascus
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |