A "New" Fragment on the Difference between Hypostasis and Enhypostaton against Tritheists
This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact cont...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
Jahr: 2023, Band: 116, Heft: 4, Seiten: 533-551 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Johannes, Philoponus 490-570
/ Leontius, Byzantinus 480-543
/ Hypostase (Philosophie)
/ Tritheismus
/ Christologie
/ Fragment
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | KAB Kirchengeschichte 30-500; Frühchristentum NBC Gotteslehre NBF Christologie VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Enhypostaton
B post-Chalcedonian christology B Tritheist controversy B Leontius of Byzantium B John Philoponus |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact contains a close parallel to a famous passage from Leontius of Byzantium’s Contra Nestorianos et Eutychianos concerning the distinction between hypostasis and enhypostaton. It is argued that the fragment was written in the aftermath of the Tritheist controversy and, more specifically, that it faces the doctrines of John Philoponus. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816023000287 |