A "New" Fragment on the Difference between Hypostasis and Enhypostaton against Tritheists
This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact cont...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| В: |
Harvard theological review
Год: 2023, Том: 116, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 533-551 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Иоанн (имя), Philoponus 490-570
/ Leontius, Byzantinus 480-543
/ Гипостаз (философия) (Философия (мотив))
/ Тритеизм
/ Христология
/ Фрагмент
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | KAB Раннее христианство NBC Бог NBF Христология VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Enhypostaton
B post-Chalcedonian christology B Tritheist controversy B Leontius of Byzantium B John Philoponus |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact contains a close parallel to a famous passage from Leontius of Byzantium’s Contra Nestorianos et Eutychianos concerning the distinction between hypostasis and enhypostaton. It is argued that the fragment was written in the aftermath of the Tritheist controversy and, more specifically, that it faces the doctrines of John Philoponus. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816023000287 |