A "New" Fragment on the Difference between Hypostasis and Enhypostaton against Tritheists
This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact cont...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Dans: |
Harvard theological review
Année: 2023, Volume: 116, Numéro: 4, Pages: 533-551 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Jean, Philoponus 490-570
/ Leontius, Byzantinus 480-543
/ Hypostase (Philosophie)
/ Trithéisme
/ Christologie
/ Fragment
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAB Christianisme primitif NBC Dieu NBF Christologie VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Enhypostaton
B post-Chalcedonian christology B Tritheist controversy B Leontius of Byzantium B John Philoponus |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | This article provides edition, translation, and annotation of a Greek excerpt dealing with the christological issue of "whether there is an anhypostatos nature." Until now unedited and recently catalogued as one of the fragments of Cyril of Alexandria’s Contra Synousiastas, it in fact contains a close parallel to a famous passage from Leontius of Byzantium’s Contra Nestorianos et Eutychianos concerning the distinction between hypostasis and enhypostaton. It is argued that the fragment was written in the aftermath of the Tritheist controversy and, more specifically, that it faces the doctrines of John Philoponus. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816023000287 |