La posible y necesaria perentoriedad de los plazos de apelación contra una sentencia «pro vinculo»
Since the reform of marriage nullity causes came into effect in 2015, the consensus has been that the peremptory nature of the time limits for introducing and pursuing an appeal applies only to pro nullitate judgments, not- to pro vinculo judgments that may be subject to later appeal. From an exeget...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Espanhol |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
HeinOnline
2023
|
| Em: |
Ius canonicum
Ano: 2023, Volume: 63, Número: 125, Páginas: 143-180 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Apelación
B Carga epistémica B Cosa juzgada |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | Since the reform of marriage nullity causes came into effect in 2015, the consensus has been that the peremptory nature of the time limits for introducing and pursuing an appeal applies only to pro nullitate judgments, not- to pro vinculo judgments that may be subject to later appeal. From an exegetical, historical and dogmatic point of view, there are good reasons to hold that pro vinculo judgments also benefit from the peremptory nature of time limits for appeals. The peremptory status of such pro vinculo judgments is possible de iure condito, and both necessary and desirable de iure condendo. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.125.003 |