Can the constitution be saved?
I reply to William Hasker's ‘The Trinity as Social and Constitutional’, continuing our debate over the use of the metaphysical concept of constitution to explicate the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| En: |
Religious studies
Año: 2023, Volumen: 59, Número: 1, Páginas: 156-164 |
| (Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Trinidad
/ Constitución (Filosofía)
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión NBC Dios |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Trinity
B Hasker B words of desolation B improper parts B Constitution |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Sumario: | I reply to William Hasker's ‘The Trinity as Social and Constitutional’, continuing our debate over the use of the metaphysical concept of constitution to explicate the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow (2021)"
|
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412521000512 |