Kokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing
This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Religion and human rights
Year: 2017, Volume: 12, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 99-111 |
| Further subjects: | B
Kokkinakis
proselytizing
proselyting
proper proselyting
improper proselytism
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Article 9
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Contains: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231156 |