Can the constitution be saved?
I reply to William Hasker's ‘The Trinity as Social and Constitutional’, continuing our debate over the use of the metaphysical concept of constitution to explicate the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2023, Volume: 59, Numéro: 1, Pages: 156-164 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Trinité
/ Constitution (Philosophie)
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Trinity
B Hasker B words of desolation B improper parts B Constitution |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | I reply to William Hasker's ‘The Trinity as Social and Constitutional’, continuing our debate over the use of the metaphysical concept of constitution to explicate the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Référence: | Kritik von "The Trinity as social and constitutional: a rejoinder to Brian Leftow (2021)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412521000512 |