Zur Kritik von Christoph Bruns an Dogma im Wandel
This article is a response to Christoph Bruns’s criticism of the book Dogma im Wandel: Wie Glaubenslehren sich entwickeln (Freiburg 2018) by Michael Seewald. The article addresses three issues discussed by Bruns: the role of the magisterium of the pope and the college of bishops, the controversial q...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Herder
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theologie und Philosophie
Year: 2020, Volume: 95, Issue: 1, Pages: 83-92 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Catholic church
/ Teaching profession
/ Doctrine
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church NBA Dogmatics RB Church office; congregation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article is a response to Christoph Bruns’s criticism of the book Dogma im Wandel: Wie Glaubenslehren sich entwickeln (Freiburg 2018) by Michael Seewald. The article addresses three issues discussed by Bruns: the role of the magisterium of the pope and the college of bishops, the controversial question of the level of what is binding in the secondary realm of doctrine, and Bruns’s conception of a homogeneous development of doctrine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0040-5655 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Mehr Spielraum als gedacht? (2020)"
Kritik in "Zur Kernproblematik des Reformdiskurses in der katholischen Kirche (2020)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theologie und Philosophie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.23769/thph-95-2020-004 |