Zur Kritik von Christoph Bruns an Dogma im Wandel
This article is a response to Christoph Bruns’s criticism of the book Dogma im Wandel: Wie Glaubenslehren sich entwickeln (Freiburg 2018) by Michael Seewald. The article addresses three issues discussed by Bruns: the role of the magisterium of the pope and the college of bishops, the controversial q...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theologie und Philosophie
Year: 2020, Volume: 95, Issue: 1, Pages: 83-92 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Catholic church
/ Teaching profession
/ Doctrine
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church NBA Dogmatics RB Church office; congregation |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | This article is a response to Christoph Bruns’s criticism of the book Dogma im Wandel: Wie Glaubenslehren sich entwickeln (Freiburg 2018) by Michael Seewald. The article addresses three issues discussed by Bruns: the role of the magisterium of the pope and the college of bishops, the controversial question of the level of what is binding in the secondary realm of doctrine, and Bruns’s conception of a homogeneous development of doctrine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2626-5346 |
| Access: | [DE-21]Open Access |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theologie und Philosophie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.60720/thph.v95i1.34711 |