A kinky doctrine of sin
Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: wh...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
| В: |
Theology & sexuality
Год: 2019, Том: 25, Выпуск: 1/2, Страницы: 21-44 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
罪
/ 性倫理
/ 同志神學
/ 解放神學
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | FD Контекстуальное богословие NBE Антропология NCF Сексуальная этика |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
BDSM
B Mary Elise Lowe B Judith Butler B Gustavo Gutiérrez B kinky B Jeremy Carrette B S / M B Gayle S. Rubin B Queer Theology B Discourse B Sexual ethics B Michel Foucault B Robert Goss B Sin |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727 |