A kinky doctrine of sin
Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: wh...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Theology & sexuality
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 25, Τεύχος: 1/2, Σελίδες: 21-44 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Sin
/ Sexual ethics
/ Queer theology
/ Liberation theology
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | FD Θεολογία βάσει συμφραζομένων NBE Ανθρωπολογία NCF Σεξουαλική Ηθική |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
BDSM
B Mary Elise Lowe B Judith Butler B Gustavo Gutiérrez B kinky B Jeremy Carrette B S / M B Gayle S. Rubin B Queer Theology B Discourse B Sexual ethics B Michel Foucault B Robert Goss B Sin |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727 |