A kinky doctrine of sin
Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: wh...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Theology & sexuality
Year: 2019, Volume: 25, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 21-44 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Sin
/ Sexual ethics
/ Queer theology
/ Liberation theology
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology NBE Anthropology NCF Sexual ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
BDSM
B Mary Elise Lowe B Judith Butler B Gustavo Gutiérrez B kinky B Jeremy Carrette B S / M B Gayle S. Rubin B Queer Theology B Discourse B Sexual ethics B Michel Foucault B Robert Goss B Sin |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5170 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727 |