What is religion?: The unexplained subject matter of religious studies
Religious studies cannot agree on a common definition of its subject matter. To break the impasse, important insights from recent discussions about post-foundational political theory might be of some help. However, they can only be of benefit in conversations about “religion” when the previous debat...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| WorldCat: | WorldCat |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2014
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Anno: 2014, Volume: 26, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 246-286 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Scienze religiose
/ Religione
/ Concetto
/ Coscienza storica
|
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Poststructuralism
Judith Butler
Ernesto Laclau
Benson Saler
Michel Foucault
eurocentrism
western concept of religion
critical theory
postcolonialism
definitions of religion
object of religious studies
historiography
discourse theory
|
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| Edizione parallela: | Non elettronico
|
| Riepilogo: | Religious studies cannot agree on a common definition of its subject matter. To break the impasse, important insights from recent discussions about post-foundational political theory might be of some help. However, they can only be of benefit in conversations about “religion” when the previous debate on the subject matter of religious studies is framed slightly differently. This is done in the first part of the article. It is, then, shown on closer inspection of past discussions on “religion” that a consensus-capable, contemporary, everyday understanding of “religion,” here called Religion 2, is assumed, though it remains unexplained and unreflected upon. The second part of the article shows how Religion 2 can be newly conceptualized through the lens of Ernesto Laclau’s political theory, combined with concepts from Judith Butler and Michel Foucault, and how Religion 2 can be established as the historical subject matter of religious studies. Though concrete historical reconstructions of Religion 2 always remain contested, I argue that this does not prevent it from being generally accepted as the subject matter of religious studies. The third part discusses the previous findings in the light of postcolonial concerns about potential Eurocentrism in the concept of “religion.” It is argued that Religion 2 has to be understood in a fully global perspective, and, as a consequence, more research on the global religious history of the 19th and 20th centuries is urgently needed. |
|---|---|
| Descrizione fisica: | 41 |
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Comprende: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341320 |
