A kinky doctrine of sin

Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Mechelke, J. D. R. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
In: Theology & sexuality
Jahr: 2019, Band: 25, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 21-44
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Sünde / Sexualethik / Queer-Theologie / Theologie der Befreiung
IxTheo Notationen:FD Kontextuelle Theologie
NBE Anthropologie
NCF Sexualethik
weitere Schlagwörter:B S/M
B BDSM
B Mary Elise Lowe
B Judith Butler
B Gustavo Gutiérrez
B kinky
B Jeremy Carrette
B Gayle S. Rubin
B Queer Theology
B Discourse
B Sexual ethics
B Michel Foucault
B Robert Goss
B Sin
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice "kinky sex." These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices.
ISSN:1745-5170
Enthält:Enthalten in: Theology & sexuality
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727