Is supernatural belief unreliably formed?

I criticize 5 arguments for the conclusion that religious belief is unreliably formed and hence epistemically tainted. The arguments draw on scientific evidence from Cognitive Science of Religion. They differ considerably as to why the evidence points to unreliability. Two arguments conclude to unre...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Eyghen, Hans van ca. 21. Jh. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
Em: International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2019, Volume: 85, Número: 2, Páginas: 125-148
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B O sobrenatural / / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
Classificações IxTheo:AA Ciências da religião
AB Filosofia da religião
AE Psicologia da religião
Outras palavras-chave:B Reliabilism
B Religious Epistemology
B cognitive science of religion
B Rationality of religious belief
B debunking arguments
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Descrição
Resumo:I criticize 5 arguments for the conclusion that religious belief is unreliably formed and hence epistemically tainted. The arguments draw on scientific evidence from Cognitive Science of Religion. They differ considerably as to why the evidence points to unreliability. Two arguments conclude to unreliability because religious belief is shaped by evolutionary pressures; another argument states that the mechanism responsible for religious belief produces many false god-beliefs; a similar argument claims that the mechanism produces incompatible god-beliefs; and a final argument states that the mechanism is offtrack. I argue that the arguments fail to make the case for unreliability or that the unreliability can be overcome.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-018-9671-4