Responding to Debunking Arguments: A Reply to Lari Launonen’s Critique
In this response article, I argue that Launonen’s criticisms either are beyond the scope of my argument in chapter 5 of Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion or wrongfully presume that evolutionary explanations exhaustively explain religious beliefs. I also criticize Launonen’s claim that argum...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2022, Volume: 87, Issue: 2, Pages: 195-207 |
Further subjects: | B
justification of religious belief
B Religious Epistemology B cognitive science of religion B debunking arguments |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | In this response article, I argue that Launonen’s criticisms either are beyond the scope of my argument in chapter 5 of Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion or wrongfully presume that evolutionary explanations exhaustively explain religious beliefs. I also criticize Launonen’s claim that arguments in terms of divine design are preferable to arguments in terms of truth-tracking cognitive mechanisms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2352-8230 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophia reformata
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/23528230-bja10046 |