Religious Belief as Acquired Second Nature

Multiple authors in cognitive science of religion (CSR) argue that there is something about the human mind that disposes it to form religious beliefs. The dispositions would result from the internal architecture of the mind. In this article, I will argue that this disposition can be explained by var...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Eyghen, Hans van ca. 21. Jh. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: [2020]
En: Zygon
Año: 2020, Volumen: 55, Número: 1, Páginas: 185-206
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Kognitive Religionswissenschaft / Religiosidad / Fe / Segunda naturaleza
Clasificaciones IxTheo:AA Ciencias de la religión
AE Psicología de la religión
Otras palabras clave:B predictive processing
B cognitive science of religion
B naturalness of religious belief
B born believers
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:Multiple authors in cognitive science of religion (CSR) argue that there is something about the human mind that disposes it to form religious beliefs. The dispositions would result from the internal architecture of the mind. In this article, I will argue that this disposition can be explained by various forms of (cultural) learning and not by the internal architecture of the mind. For my argument, I draw on new developments in predictive processing. I argue that CSR theories argue for the naturalness of religious belief in at least three ways; religious beliefs are adaptive; religious beliefs are the product of cognitive biases; and religious beliefs are the product of content biases. I argue that all three ideas can be integrated in a predictive coding framework where religious belief is learned and hence not caused by the internal architecture of the mind. I argue that the framework makes it doubtful that there are modular cognitive mechanisms for religious beliefs and that the human mind has a fixed proneness for religious belief. I also argue that a predictive coding framework can incorporate a larger role for cultural processes and allows for more flexibility.
ISSN:1467-9744
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12575