Is supernatural belief unreliably formed?

I criticize 5 arguments for the conclusion that religious belief is unreliably formed and hence epistemically tainted. The arguments draw on scientific evidence from Cognitive Science of Religion. They differ considerably as to why the evidence points to unreliability. Two arguments conclude to unre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Eyghen, Hans van ca. 21. Jh. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2019]
En: International journal for philosophy of religion
Año: 2019, Volumen: 85, Número: 2, Páginas: 125-148
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Lo sobrenatural / Fe / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
Clasificaciones IxTheo:AA Ciencias de la religión
AB Filosofía de la religión
AE Psicología de la religión
Otras palabras clave:B Reliabilism
B Religious Epistemology
B cognitive science of religion
B Rationality of religious belief
B debunking arguments
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Descripción
Sumario:I criticize 5 arguments for the conclusion that religious belief is unreliably formed and hence epistemically tainted. The arguments draw on scientific evidence from Cognitive Science of Religion. They differ considerably as to why the evidence points to unreliability. Two arguments conclude to unreliability because religious belief is shaped by evolutionary pressures; another argument states that the mechanism responsible for religious belief produces many false god-beliefs; a similar argument claims that the mechanism produces incompatible god-beliefs; and a final argument states that the mechanism is offtrack. I argue that the arguments fail to make the case for unreliability or that the unreliability can be overcome.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-018-9671-4