Enhypostaton: Being “in Another” or Being “with Another”?—How Chalcedonian Theologians of the Sixth Century defined the Ontological Status of Christ’s Human Nature
This article focuses on the term enhypostaton. It makes the case that this term was originally coined in order to express three modes of being: “by itself”, “with another” and “in another”. The first and third of these modes could not explain the status of the flesh as a nature, which does not have...
| Τόπος έκδοσης: | Vigiliae Christianae |
|---|---|
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
2017
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | KAD Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 500-900, Πρώιμος Μεσαίωνας NBE Ανθρωπολογία NBF Χριστολογία |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Christology
Chalcedonian Formula
Enhypostaton
Hypostasis
John of Damascus
|
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Σύνοψη: | This article focuses on the term enhypostaton. It makes the case that this term was originally coined in order to express three modes of being: “by itself”, “with another” and “in another”. The first and third of these modes could not explain the status of the flesh as a nature, which does not have a hypostasis of its own, since they denoted full-blown hypostases and mere accidents. By contrast, the second mode was tailored to the specific case of the human being where soul and body as complete natures come together to form a single hypostasis, which had traditionally served as a paradigm for the incarnation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341306 |