Enhypostaton: Being “in Another” or Being “with Another”?—How Chalcedonian Theologians of the Sixth Century defined the Ontological Status of Christ’s Human Nature
This article focuses on the term enhypostaton. It makes the case that this term was originally coined in order to express three modes of being: “by itself”, “with another” and “in another”. The first and third of these modes could not explain the status of the flesh as a nature, which does not have...
| Published in: | Vigiliae Christianae |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
|
| IxTheo Classification: | KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages NBE Anthropology NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Christology
Chalcedonian Formula
Enhypostaton
Hypostasis
John of Damascus
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1563007711 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604143123.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170904s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700720-12341306 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1563007711 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)493007717 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ493007717 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1033335843 |0 (DE-627)74091068X |0 (DE-576)380926105 |4 aut |a Krausmüller, Dirk |d 1962- | |
| 109 | |a Krausmüller, Dirk 1962- |a Krausmiler, Dirk 1962- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Enhypostaton |b Being “in Another” or Being “with Another”?—How Chalcedonian Theologians of the Sixth Century defined the Ontological Status of Christ’s Human Nature |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article focuses on the term enhypostaton. It makes the case that this term was originally coined in order to express three modes of being: “by itself”, “with another” and “in another”. The first and third of these modes could not explain the status of the flesh as a nature, which does not have a hypostasis of its own, since they denoted full-blown hypostases and mere accidents. By contrast, the second mode was tailored to the specific case of the human being where soul and body as complete natures come together to form a single hypostasis, which had traditionally served as a paradigm for the incarnation. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Christology |x Chalcedonian Formula |x Enhypostaton |x Hypostasis |x John of Damascus | |
| 652 | |a KAD:NBE:NBF | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Vigiliae Christianae |d Leiden : Brill, 1947 |g 71(2017), 4, Seite 433-448 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341344354 |w (DE-600)2067144-1 |w (DE-576)10051779X |x 1570-0720 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:433-448 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700720-12341306 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 71 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 433-448 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 297929778X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1563007711 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180202094223 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170904||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051787 |a NBF | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044454 |a KAD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||