Searching for Non-Toxic Religion
This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2011
|
In: |
International journal of public theology
Year: 2011, Volume: 5, Issue: 4, Pages: 476-487 |
Further subjects: | B
Religion And Public Life
tolerance
Daniel Dennett
dogmatism
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given situation. In addition, the article proposes rules of engagement for how we might deal with these aspects in public discourse. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-7320 |
Contains: | In: International journal of public theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/156973211X595952 |