Searching for Non-Toxic Religion
This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given s...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2011
|
| Em: |
International journal of public theology
Ano: 2011, Volume: 5, Número: 4, Páginas: 476-487 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Religion And Public Life
tolerance
Daniel Dennett
dogmatism
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Publisher) |
| Resumo: | This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given situation. In addition, the article proposes rules of engagement for how we might deal with these aspects in public discourse. |
|---|---|
| Descrição Física: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1569-7320 |
| Obras secundárias: | In: International journal of public theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/156973211X595952 |
