Searching for Non-Toxic Religion
This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given s...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2011
|
| Dans: |
International journal of public theology
Année: 2011, Volume: 5, Numéro: 4, Pages: 476-487 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religion And Public Life
tolerance
Daniel Dennett
dogmatism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article provides more accurate tools to engage the public nature of religious and other ideological claims by proposing a distinction between belief-policies, beliefs and practices that could enable more acute ways of locating the aspects of ideology that are considered problematic in a given situation. In addition, the article proposes rules of engagement for how we might deal with these aspects in public discourse. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1569-7320 |
| Contient: | In: International journal of public theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/156973211X595952 |