The Resurrected Body, Will It Be of Flesh or Spiritual?
The resurrection of the dead according to Origen and Philoponus is spiritual and not of the flesh. Their opinion, contrary to the official Christian view, was influenced by the neo-Platonic doctrine of “the subtle body of the soul” and based upon Aristotelian logic. Origen’s argumentation was formed...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2015, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 225-241 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology NBQ Eschatology |
| Further subjects: | B
bodily resurrection
anthropology
Origenism
Gregory of Nyssa
Cyril of Alexandria
John Philoponus
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | The resurrection of the dead according to Origen and Philoponus is spiritual and not of the flesh. Their opinion, contrary to the official Christian view, was influenced by the neo-Platonic doctrine of “the subtle body of the soul” and based upon Aristotelian logic. Origen’s argumentation was formed as a personal interpretation of the passage of the Apostle Paul (1 Cor. 15:39–47) where Paul mentions that the risen body will be spiritual. Philoponus argumentation, on the other hand, was mostly based upon the Aristotelian logic and he thus directed his polemic against the irrationality of the arguments of Cyril of Alexandria and of Gregory of Nyssa.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contains: | In: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00111p20 |