When Jesus lost his soul: fourth-century christology and modern neuroscience
Modern conversations between the natural sciences and theology on the human soul have not so far engaged extensively with relevant debates in the early church. Contemporary neuroscience tends to operate within a monistic paradigm, often referred to as physicalism', that understands human menta...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 74-92 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Soul
/ Neurosciences
/ Church
/ Theological anthropology
/ Apollinarism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Soul music
B Apollinarianism B Gregory of Nyssa B Gregory of Nazianzus B non-reductive physicalism B Theological Anthropology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Modern conversations between the natural sciences and theology on the human soul have not so far engaged extensively with relevant debates in the early church. Contemporary neuroscience tends to operate within a monistic paradigm, often referred to as physicalism', that understands human mental activity entirely in naturalistic terms. While there is ongoing scientific debate about the degree to which human consciousness can be reduced entirely to biology, physicalism is often cited as making traditional religious belief in the soul obsolete, or at least modifying it significantly. The Apollinarian question of whether Jesus has a soul therefore reappears. This article considers the contemporary relevance of the Apollinarian controversy, suggesting that fourth-century insights possess key points of contact with the modern non-reductive physicalist position and thus raising important considerations for the science-theology conversation on the soul. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061600048X |