God as an asset and some paradoxical implications
Conventional monotheist religious believers commonly believe that God will sometimes assist them, will be on their side. God, in other words, they believe, is an asset. Conceptually an asset is anything (such as a person or an object) that can assist one, something that is prima facie good to posses...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2024
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 60, Issue: 2, Pages: 193-203 |
Further subjects: | B
Religious Beliefs
B Assets B Moral Obligations B Moral Dilemmas B moral paradoxes |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1890825069 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240606140217.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240606s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412523000082 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1890825069 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1890825069 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1259429717 |0 (DE-627)1806413345 |4 aut |a Smilansky, Saul | |
109 | |a Smilansky, Saul | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a God as an asset and some paradoxical implications |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Conventional monotheist religious believers commonly believe that God will sometimes assist them, will be on their side. God, in other words, they believe, is an asset. Conceptually an asset is anything (such as a person or an object) that can assist one, something that is prima facie good to possess or to have on one's side, that is likely to or can assist one to make one's life go better, overall. Having assets can have weighty implications, including moral ones. I argue that here the implications are quite surprising, and indeed paradoxical. In particular, the religious will have in certain circumstances good reasons, and sometimes even moral obligations, to give up their interests for those who lack such assets, namely secular non-believers. The claim is not that religious people actually see things in this way but that, normatively, given their beliefs, many of them should, in the sense of the subjective "ought". This can be relevant both in this world and concerning the next. Moreover, in many situations plausible religious replies are not sufficient to block the move. This topic has not, to the best of my knowledge, ever been seriously analysed philosophically. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Religious Beliefs | |
650 | 4 | |a Assets | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral Dilemmas | |
650 | 4 | |a Moral Obligations | |
650 | 4 | |a moral paradoxes | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 60(2024), 2, Seite 193-203 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:193-203 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000082 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/god-as-an-asset-and-some-paradoxical-implications/833829AFD1497FF3D10E7D5B8A9A94D0 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4535034273 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1890825069 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20240606140217 | ||
LOK | |0 008 240606||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |