"Dulcor misericordiae". Justicia y misericordia en el ejercicio de la autoridad canónica. I. Historia
In the early stages of canon law there was a specific need to intervene to ensure equity in given situations. Canonical equity began to take two forms: perfect justice and benign intervention. These two «souls» have coexisted since the start. Equity encompasses epikeia when the general nature of the...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Испанский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2016
|
| В: |
Ius canonicum
Год: 2016, Том: 56, Выпуск: 112, Страницы: 585-619 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Misericordia
B aequitas canonica B Justicia |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | In the early stages of canon law there was a specific need to intervene to ensure equity in given situations. Canonical equity began to take two forms: perfect justice and benign intervention. These two «souls» have coexisted since the start. Equity encompasses epikeia when the general nature of the law prevents the just appraisal of a specific case. Three representative cases are considered to provide a clearer understanding of the medieval canonical doctrine on aequitas: a letter by St. Augustine in the Decretum Gratiani; a passage from a decretal by Honorius III contained in the Liber Extra; and the great debate between Martinus Gosia and Bulgarus. A number of conclusions as to the ongoing value of equity and some hermeneutical rules relating to its application are drawn on the basis of this discussion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.112.585-619 |
