Luke 22:36 and Hsiao’s Libertarian ‘Theology’ of Gun Ownership
Christian philosopher Timothy Hsiao has recently provided in this journal a defence of gun ownership and public gun carrying. I will respond with an argument against gun ownership for self-defence. In particular I will argue that Hsiao’s argument misuses Scripture, fails to employ a range of importa...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2023
|
| В: |
The Evangelical quarterly
Год: 2023, Том: 94, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 133-153 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Self-defence
B Timothy Hsiao B Gun carrying B Gun Ownership B Luke 22:36 B Christian Ethics B Gun control |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Christian philosopher Timothy Hsiao has recently provided in this journal a defence of gun ownership and public gun carrying. I will respond with an argument against gun ownership for self-defence. In particular I will argue that Hsiao’s argument misuses Scripture, fails to employ a range of important theological categories, and leads to increased harms. I argue these failings occur because Hsiao’s fundamental objective is not to seek a Kingdom of God theology of guns but rather to defend a libertarian social vision. In effect, his thin theology is really a veneer for a libertarian defence of guns and gun culture, whereas I argue that a Kingdom of God theology seeks to provide a safer society and thus would move society away from gun culture. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2772-5472 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: The Evangelical quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/27725472-09402005 |