Luke 22:36 and Hsiao’s Libertarian ‘Theology’ of Gun Ownership

Christian philosopher Timothy Hsiao has recently provided in this journal a defence of gun ownership and public gun carrying. I will respond with an argument against gun ownership for self-defence. In particular I will argue that Hsiao’s argument misuses Scripture, fails to employ a range of importa...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Barrigar, Chris (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2023
Dans: The Evangelical quarterly
Année: 2023, Volume: 94, Numéro: 2, Pages: 133-153
Sujets non-standardisés:B Self-defence
B Timothy Hsiao
B Gun carrying
B Gun Ownership
B Luke 22:36
B Christian Ethics
B Gun control
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Christian philosopher Timothy Hsiao has recently provided in this journal a defence of gun ownership and public gun carrying. I will respond with an argument against gun ownership for self-defence. In particular I will argue that Hsiao’s argument misuses Scripture, fails to employ a range of important theological categories, and leads to increased harms. I argue these failings occur because Hsiao’s fundamental objective is not to seek a Kingdom of God theology of guns but rather to defend a libertarian social vision. In effect, his thin theology is really a veneer for a libertarian defence of guns and gun culture, whereas I argue that a Kingdom of God theology seeks to provide a safer society and thus would move society away from gun culture.
ISSN:2772-5472
Contient:Enthalten in: The Evangelical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/27725472-09402005