Process theodicy and the life after death: a possibility or a necessity?

In this paper I argue for the necessity of eschatology for process thought, and against the idea that the belief in a life after death is not an essential element for this theodicy. Without reference to an eschatological dimension, a process theodicy is led to admit a consequentialist conception of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vescovelli, Sofia (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Italian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Università degli Studi di Urbino 2021
In: Nuovo giornale di filosofia della religione
Year: 2021, Volume: 15, Pages: 7-26
Further subjects:B Fede
B Ontology
B Monoteismo
B Reason
B Phenomenology
B Religious philosophy
B Filosofia della Religione
B Religione
B Filosofia
B Essere
B Ebraismo
B God
B Ontologia
B philosophy of religion
B Cristianesimo
B Religion
B Faith
B Metaphysics
B Christianity
B Dio
B Ermeneutica
B Ragione
B Hebraism
B Metafisica
B Fenomenologia
B Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1839161132
003 DE-627
005 20230314162445.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230314s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||ita c
035 |a (DE-627)1839161132 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1839161132 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Vescovelli, Sofia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Process theodicy and the life after death: a possibility or a necessity? 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper I argue for the necessity of eschatology for process thought, and against the idea that the belief in a life after death is not an essential element for this theodicy. Without reference to an eschatological dimension, a process theodicy is led to admit a consequentialist conception of divine love and goodness that is inconsistent with its notion of a responsive and participative God who loves each creature. In the world many creatures suffer atrocious evils, which destroy the value of their lives, but the process God does not redeem these sufferings in a personal post-mortem life in which the sufferers participate and can find meaning for their individual evils. In order to support my thesis, I intend to examine some difficulties in process theodicy, especially in Charles Hartshorne’s position, showing how his doctrine of objective immortality is unsatisfactory. My starting point will be some criticisms advanced by John Hick against Hartshorne and the replies made by the process philosopher David R. Griffin. I conclude by contending that process theodicy, at least in its Hartshornean version, in denying the necessity of a personal afterlife, does not provide a satisfying answer to the soteriological-individual aspect of the problem of evil, namely the problem of the individual salvation in which the individual person can find redemption and meaning for the sufferings undergone or inflicted. In the process perspective the divine love is conceived in consequentialist terms and evils suffered by the individual are merely considered a by-product or the negative side of the divine creation out of chaos. 
650 4 |a Christianity 
650 4 |a Cristianesimo 
650 4 |a Dio 
650 4 |a Ebraismo 
650 4 |a Ermeneutica 
650 4 |a Essere 
650 4 |a Faith 
650 4 |a Fede 
650 4 |a Fenomenologia 
650 4 |a Filosofia 
650 4 |a Filosofia della Religione 
650 4 |a Glaube 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Gott 
650 4 |a Hebraism 
650 4 |a Metafisica 
650 4 |a Metaphysics 
650 4 |a Monoteismo 
650 4 |a Ontologia 
650 4 |a Ontology 
650 4 |a Phenomenology 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
650 4 |a philosophy of religion 
650 4 |a Ragione 
650 4 |a Reason 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Religione 
650 4 |a Religionsphilosophie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Nuovo giornale di filosofia della religione  |d Urbino : Università degli Studi di Urbino, 2017  |g 15(2021), Seite 7-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1735674605  |w (DE-600)3041905-0  |x 2532-1676  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2021  |g pages:7-26 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.uniurb.it/index.php/NGFR/article/view/3053  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2021  |h 7-26 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4290057047 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1839161132 
LOK |0 005 20230314162445 
LOK |0 008 230314||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Faith,Faith,Belief in God,God,God,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion 
STB 0 0 |a Dieu,Dieu,Foi,Foi,Philosophie des religions,Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Dios,Dios,Fe,Fe,Filosofía de religión,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Dio,Dio,Fede,Fede,Filosofia della religione,Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,宗教,宗教,宗教哲学,神,神,上帝,上帝 
STF 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,宗教,宗教,宗教哲學,神,神,上帝,上帝 
STG 0 0 |a Deus,Deus,Filosofia da religião,Fé,Fé,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Вера (мотив),Вера,Религия,Религия (мотив),Философия религии 
STI 0 0 |a Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Πίστη (μοτίβο),Πίστη,Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Dion Chrysostomus , Glauben,Gottesglaube,Überzeugung , Playing God , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie