Religion, reason and non-directive teaching: a reply to Trevor Cooling
In other work I have argued that decisions about what to teach directively and what non-directively should be governed by an epistemic criterion. Trevor Cooling has recently advanced some objections to my defence and application of the epistemic criterion and proposed an alternative to it. Here I re...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2014
|
| In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2014, Volume: 35, Issue: 1, Pages: 79-85 |
| Further subjects: | B
epistemic criterion
B non-directive teaching B diversity criterion B Keywords B behavioural criterion B directive teaching B Scriptural Authority B Religion B Reason |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In other work I have argued that decisions about what to teach directively and what non-directively should be governed by an epistemic criterion. Trevor Cooling has recently advanced some objections to my defence and application of the epistemic criterion and proposed an alternative to it. Here I reply to his objections and comment on his proposed alternative. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-9362 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2014.884859 |