Christianity and Public Book Banning

Modernization theory is used to understand why conservative Protestants tend to be intolerant. We explain this tendency as a consequence of a religious worldview that privileges a sacred group and that exhibits a mistrust of the individual. Using a random sample of "Middletown" residents (...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Tamney, Joseph B. (Author) ; Johnson, Stephen D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publications 1997
In: Review of religious research
Year: 1997, Volume: 38, Issue: 3, Pages: 263-271
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:Modernization theory is used to understand why conservative Protestants tend to be intolerant. We explain this tendency as a consequence of a religious worldview that privileges a sacred group and that exhibits a mistrust of the individual. Using a random sample of "Middletown" residents (N = 500), we tested the proposition that conservative Protestants are willing to ban controversial books from public libraries because they are more likely to be theologically fundamentalist and morally traditionalist. Control variables were generation, gender, education, and political conservatism. The results support the importance of fundamentalism in explaining the association between conservative Protestantism and intolerance. In addition, it was found that among mainline Protestants, moral traditionalism was related to intolerance. Conservative Protestants can believe in civil intolerance because of their anti-modern, fundamentalist theology. Among mainline Protestants, because specific moral issues are more salient than theological matters, support for book banning results from a fear of moral decay.
ISSN:2211-4866
Contains:Enthalten in: Review of religious research
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3512087