A COMPARISON OF THE "A" AND "B" MANUSCRIPTS OF THE DAMASCUS DOCUMENT
This article gives a text-critical analysis of each variant between the overlapping portions of manuscripts "A" and "B" of the Damascus Document. It attempts to prove that the two manuscripts stem from one original, and that the variants can be explained as the result of mechanic...
| Published in: | Revue de Qumran |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
1987
|
| In: |
Revue de Qumran
Year: 1987, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 537-553 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | This article gives a text-critical analysis of each variant between the overlapping portions of manuscripts "A" and "B" of the Damascus Document. It attempts to prove that the two manuscripts stem from one original, and that the variants can be explained as the result of mechanical error, rather than the result of deliberate recensional activity. Cet article propose une analyse critique de toutes les variantes des passages parallèles des manuscrits A et B du Document de Damas. Il essaie de prouver que les deux manuscrits sont issus d'un même original et que les variantes peuvent être expliquées comme le résultat d'erreurs mécaniques plutôt que celui d'un travail recensionnel délibéré. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2506-7567 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Revue de Qumran
|