Why the Horrendous Deeds Objection Is Still a Bad Argument
A common objection to divine command meta-ethics (‘DCM’) is the horrendous deeds objection. Critics object that if DCM is true, anything at all could be right, no matter how abhorrent or horrendous. Defenders of DCM have responded by contending that God is essentially good: God has certain character...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2022, Volume: 61, Issue: 2, Pages: 399-418 |
| Further subjects: | B
Wes Morriston
B God and morality B Divine Command Theory B Horrendous deeds objection B Walter Sinnott-Armstrong B Louise Antony B Essential goodness B Jason Thibodeau B Richard Joyce B Brad Hooker |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | A common objection to divine command meta-ethics (‘DCM’) is the horrendous deeds objection. Critics object that if DCM is true, anything at all could be right, no matter how abhorrent or horrendous. Defenders of DCM have responded by contending that God is essentially good: God has certain character traits essentially, such as being loving and just. A person with these character traits cannot command just anything. In recent discussions of DCM, this ‘essential goodness response’ has come under fire. Critics of DCM have offered various objections to the essential goodness response. This paper responds to these critics. I examine and refute six such objections: (a) the objection from counterpossibles, (b) the objection from omnipotence, (c) the objection from requirements of justice, (d) the objection from God’s moral grounding power, (e) the objection from evil and indifferent deities, and (f) the epistemological objection. I will maintain that despite all that has been said about the horrendous deeds objection in recent analytic philosophy, the horrendous deeds argument is still a bad argument. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Reference: | Kritik in "God's Love and the Horrendous Deeds Objection (2024)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-020-00803-7 |