Let's Play GOLF! Or, the Free Will Defense Is Dead
A central feature of the "free will defense" as developed by Alvin Plantinga is his response to the claim that God can create a world containing creatures with libertarian freedom that contains no moral evil. Plantinga’s response appeals to the notion of "morally significant freedom&q...
Autres titres: | The Free Will Defense Is Dead |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2021
|
Dans: |
TheoLogica
Année: 2021, Volume: 5, Numéro: 2, Pages: 178-193 |
Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu NBE Anthropologie NCA Éthique |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Free Will Defense
B Theodicy B Libertarianism B Alvin Plantinga B problem of evil |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | A central feature of the "free will defense" as developed by Alvin Plantinga is his response to the claim that God can create a world containing creatures with libertarian freedom that contains no moral evil. Plantinga’s response appeals to the notion of "morally significant freedom" according to which free creatures, in order to do moral good, must be capable of moral evil. In this paper, I argue, first, that morally significant freedom is not required for free creatures to do moral good and, second, that other recent attempts to necessitate a creaturely capability for evil likewise fail. The upshot of my paper is that the free will defense simply won’t work because it is possible and feasible for God to create a world containing libertarianly free creatures capable of moral good and yet containing no moral evil. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i2.20343 |