Let's Play GOLF! Or, the Free Will Defense Is Dead

A central feature of the "free will defense" as developed by Alvin Plantinga is his response to the claim that God can create a world containing creatures with libertarian freedom that contains no moral evil. Plantinga’s response appeals to the notion of "morally significant freedom&q...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:TheoLogica
Subtitles:The Free Will Defense Is Dead
Main Author: Cowan, Steven B. 1962- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain 2021
In: TheoLogica
Year: 2021, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 178-193
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
NBE Anthropology
NCA Ethics
Further subjects:B Free Will Defense
B Theodicy
B Libertarianism
B Alvin Plantinga
B problem of evil
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:A central feature of the "free will defense" as developed by Alvin Plantinga is his response to the claim that God can create a world containing creatures with libertarian freedom that contains no moral evil. Plantinga’s response appeals to the notion of "morally significant freedom" according to which free creatures, in order to do moral good, must be capable of moral evil. In this paper, I argue, first, that morally significant freedom is not required for free creatures to do moral good and, second, that other recent attempts to necessitate a creaturely capability for evil likewise fail. The upshot of my paper is that the free will defense simply won’t work because it is possible and feasible for God to create a world containing libertarianly free creatures capable of moral good and yet containing no moral evil.
ISSN:2593-0265
Contains:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i2.20343