Bones of Contention: The Decision to Amputate in Early Modern Germany
The removal of a patient's limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the "cold fire" (der kalte Brand)—a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering conseque...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, Inc.
2016
|
| Dans: |
The sixteenth century journal
Année: 2016, Volume: 47, Numéro: 2, Pages: 327-350 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | The removal of a patient's limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the "cold fire" (der kalte Brand)—a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering consequences for patients and their families. By drawing on surgical treatises, correspondences, field manuals, and examination books, this article uncovers a process of negotiation that took place during diagnosis and prognosis in cases of the cold fire. Medical reasoning entered a volatile social space in order to determine the best course of action. The opinions of medical colleagues, patients, family members, friends, and even pastors were crucial to the formation of a shared consensus necessary to undertake a procedure. Amputation was a collective endeavor guided as much by communal concerns as by medical ones. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2326-0726 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The sixteenth century journal
|