Bones of Contention: The Decision to Amputate in Early Modern Germany
The removal of a patient's limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the "cold fire" (der kalte Brand)—a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering conseque...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, Inc.
2016
|
In: |
The sixteenth century journal
Year: 2016, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 327-350 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | The removal of a patient's limb was the most radical procedure performed by early modern surgeons. It occurred only when a part of the body was considered lost to the "cold fire" (der kalte Brand)—a final, irreversible putrefaction. The harrowing experience held life-altering consequences for patients and their families. By drawing on surgical treatises, correspondences, field manuals, and examination books, this article uncovers a process of negotiation that took place during diagnosis and prognosis in cases of the cold fire. Medical reasoning entered a volatile social space in order to determine the best course of action. The opinions of medical colleagues, patients, family members, friends, and even pastors were crucial to the formation of a shared consensus necessary to undertake a procedure. Amputation was a collective endeavor guided as much by communal concerns as by medical ones. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2326-0726 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The sixteenth century journal
|