On seeking first to understand
There are fundamental differences between seeking-to-solve and seeking-to-understand. We are strongly biased toward seeking-to-solve on a number of dimensions. As a result, we are increasingly at risk in a world that is becoming increasingly complex and fast paced. We therefore need to understand th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
1999
|
| In: |
Teaching business ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 113-136 |
| Further subjects: | B
double-loop learning
B Synthesis B Moral Philosophy B Systems |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | There are fundamental differences between seeking-to-solve and seeking-to-understand. We are strongly biased toward seeking-to-solve on a number of dimensions. As a result, we are increasingly at risk in a world that is becoming increasingly complex and fast paced. We therefore need to understand these biases so that we can defend ourselves -- we need to develop (moral) concepts and methods of inquiry that transcend our dominant and pervasive analytical presuppositions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-1944 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Teaching business ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1023/A:1009892614592 |