On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s "New Historiographical Approach"

In a recent article, William C. Roach (2019) offers a presuppositional critique, which is inspired by Carl F. H. Henry, of Michael R. Licona’s (2010) so-called New Historiographical Approach (NHA) to defending the resurrection. More precisely, Roach attempts to defend six key theses, namely, that (1...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Erasmus, Jacob ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author) ; Licona, Michael R. 1961- (Author)
Contributors: Roach, William C. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sciendo, De Gruyter 2021
In: Perichoresis
Year: 2021, Volume: 19, Issue: 4, Pages: 21-33
IxTheo Classification:KAA Church history
NAB Fundamental theology
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B William C. Roach
B Presuppositionalism
B Michael R. Licona
B EVIDENTIALISM
B New Historiographical Approach
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1801375712
003 DE-627
005 20230629114240.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220511s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2478/perc-2021-0022  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1801375712 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1801375712 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1245582313  |0 (DE-627)1777282144  |4 aut  |a Erasmus, Jacob  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
109 |a Erasmus, Jacob ca. 20./21. Jh.  |a Erasmus, Jacobus ca. 20./21. Jh. 
245 1 0 |a On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s "New Historiographical Approach" 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In a recent article, William C. Roach (2019) offers a presuppositional critique, which is inspired by Carl F. H. Henry, of Michael R. Licona’s (2010) so-called New Historiographical Approach (NHA) to defending the resurrection. More precisely, Roach attempts to defend six key theses, namely, that (1) the NHA is an evidentialist approach, (2) the NHA is a deductive argument, (3) the NHA is an insufficient approach, (4) believers and unbelievers share no common ground, (5) the NHA does not embrace a correspondence theory of truth, and (6) the presupposition of divine revelation is necessary for apologetics. We respond to each of Roach’s arguments, respectively. 
650 4 |a Michael R. Licona 
650 4 |a New Historiographical Approach 
650 4 |a William C. Roach 
650 4 |a EVIDENTIALISM 
650 4 |a Presuppositionalism 
652 |a KAA:NAB:NBF 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)143506560  |0 (DE-627)704511452  |0 (DE-576)334982561  |4 aut  |a Licona, Michael R.  |d 1961- 
700 1 |a Roach, William C.  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Perichoresis  |d Warsaw, Poland : Sciendo, De Gruyter, 2003  |g 19(2021), 4, Seite 21-33  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)730279154  |w (DE-600)2691385-9  |w (DE-576)375595902  |x 2284-7308  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:21-33 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Roach, William C.  |t Historical or Presuppositional Apologetics  |d 2019  |w (DE-627)1685870694 
856 |u https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/perc-2021-0022  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2021-0022  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 19  |j 2021  |e 4  |h 21-33 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4131923076 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1801375712 
LOK |0 005 20220616160536 
LOK |0 008 220511||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044225  |a KAA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442050926  |a NAB 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw