A Response to John Frame's Presuppositional Approach to Faith and Reason
Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 356-376 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church NAB Fundamental theology NBB Doctrine of Revelation |
Further subjects: | B
Presuppositionalism
B noetic effects of sin B Faith and reason B theological presuppositions B authority of Scripture |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Presuppositionalism is popular among certain groups of Reformed Christians today, and John Frame is one of its leading proponents. In contrast with the Evidential Approach concerning faith and reason, which affirms experiences and reason as starting points, Presuppositionalists assume the truth of scripture as starting point in their assessment of the truth-claims of Christianity. They appeal to Christians by emphasizing the authority of scripture, by criticizing autonomous human reason, and by highlighting the noetic effects of sin. I address these considerations, show that Frame's approach is self-defeating and unacceptably circular, and answer his objections to the Evidential Approach. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1569-7312 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15697312-01204008 |