Interpreting the probabilities in Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism

While much has been written about the probabilities referenced in Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, insufficient attention has been paid to the question of how these probabilities are to be interpreted. In this paper, I demonstrate that objective interpretations entail the denial...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Neels, Gerrit (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Nature B. V 2022
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2022, Volume: 91, Numéro: 3, Pages: 163-175
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Plantinga, Alvin 1932- / Wahrscheinlichkeit / Evolution / Naturalismus (Philosophie) / Erkenntnistheorie / Überzeugung / Objektivität / Bayes-Regel
Classifications IxTheo:VA Philosophie
VB Herméneutique; philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Full and partial belief
B Defeaters
B Probability
B evolutionary argument against naturalism
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:While much has been written about the probabilities referenced in Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, insufficient attention has been paid to the question of how these probabilities are to be interpreted. In this paper, I demonstrate that objective interpretations entail the denial of traditional theism, making them unsuitable for Plantinga’s purpose here. With respect to epistemic interpretations, I note that standard Bayesianism is too permissive for Plantinga’s purposes. I then argue that Plantinga’s use of the Principle of Indifference is at odds with his Reformed Epistemology. I conclude with some suggestions for how defenders of the argument might proceed.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-021-09818-7