Sola Scriptura and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism

Inspired by Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), we develop an argument - the "Scriptural Argument Against Dogmatic Protestantism" (SAADP) - that Protestants who accept the doctrine of sola scriptura cannot reasonably hold that Catholic and Eastern churches are...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Stacey, Gregory R. P. (Συγγραφέας)
Άλλοι συγγραφείς: McNabb, Tyler Dalton ca. 20./21. Jh.
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2025
Στο/Στη: TheoLogica
Έτος: 2025, Τόμος: 9, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 1-23
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
B Sola Scriptura
B Scripture
B Alvin Plantinga
B Protestantism
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:Inspired by Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN), we develop an argument - the "Scriptural Argument Against Dogmatic Protestantism" (SAADP) - that Protestants who accept the doctrine of sola scriptura cannot reasonably hold that Catholic and Eastern churches are in doctrinal error. If sola scriptura is true and Catholic and Eastern Churches have fallen into error, it is improbable that any Protestant can reliably form true beliefs about controversial points of Christian doctrine, including sola scriptura or suggestions that Catholic and Eastern Christians are in error. We evaluate potential responses to SADDP, considering how SAADP should affect ecumenical doctrinal debates.
ISSN:2593-0265
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v9i1.79213